linux-kernel - [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: denali: remove the old unified controller/chip DT support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:26:54 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: denali: remove the old unified controller/chip DT support

Commit d8e8fd0ebf8b ("mtd: rawnand: denali: decouple controller and
NAND chips") supported the new binding for the separate controller/chip
representation, keeping the backward compatibility.

All the device trees in upstream migrated to the new binding.

Remove the support for the old binding.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
---

 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali_dt.c | 55 +++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali_dt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali_dt.c
index 5e14836f6bd5..4cce9ae33b8e 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali_dt.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali_dt.c
@@ -102,47 +102,6 @@ static int denali_dt_chip_init(struct denali_controller *denali,
 	return denali_chip_init(denali, dchip);
 }
 
-/* Backward compatibility for old platforms */
-static int denali_dt_legacy_chip_init(struct denali_controller *denali)
-{
-	struct denali_chip *dchip;
-	int nsels, i;
-
-	nsels = denali->nbanks;
-
-	dchip = devm_kzalloc(denali->dev, struct_size(dchip, sels, nsels),
-			     GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!dchip)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	dchip->nsels = nsels;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < nsels; i++)
-		dchip->sels[i].bank = i;
-
-	nand_set_flash_node(&dchip->chip, denali->dev->of_node);
-
-	return denali_chip_init(denali, dchip);
-}
-
-/*
- * Check the DT binding.
- * The new binding expects chip subnodes in the controller node.
- * So, #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; are required.
- * Check the #size-cells to distinguish the binding.
- */
-static bool denali_dt_is_legacy_binding(struct device_node *np)
-{
-	u32 cells;
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "#size-cells", &cells);
-	if (ret)
-		return true;
-
-	return cells != 0;
-}
-
 static int denali_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -213,17 +172,11 @@ static int denali_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_disable_clk_ecc;
 
-	if (denali_dt_is_legacy_binding(dev->of_node)) {
-		ret = denali_dt_legacy_chip_init(denali);
-		if (ret)
+	for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, np) {
+		ret = denali_dt_chip_init(denali, np);
+		if (ret) {
+			of_node_put(np);
 			goto out_remove_denali;
-	} else {
-		for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, np) {
-			ret = denali_dt_chip_init(denali, np);
-			if (ret) {
-				of_node_put(np);
-				goto out_remove_denali;
-			}
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.17.1