linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] mtd: rawnand: Add support Macronix Block Protection function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OF94EDFFB1.AFAD9C25-ON4825849A.002E2815-4825849A.002FB1CE@mxic.com.tw>
Date:   Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:40:57 +0800
From:   masonccyang@...c.com.tw
To:     "Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Cc:     bbrezillon@...nel.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
        dwmw2@...radead.org, frieder.schrempf@...tron.de,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, juliensu@...c.com.tw,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com, marek.vasut@...il.com,
        "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, richard@....at,
        tglx@...utronix.de, vigneshr@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] mtd: rawnand: Add support Macronix Block Protection
 function


Hi Boris,

 
> > > > > > Then fill-in these two hooks from the manufacturer code, 
without 
> > the
> > > > > > postponed init.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > But in the final of nand_scan_tail(), mtd->_lock/_unlock will be
> > > > > filled by NULL, right ? 
> > > > 
> > > > The NAND core should set mtd->_lock/_unlock() to NAND specific 
hooks 
> > so
> > > > that the MTD layer is abstracted and and drivers do not see it. 
Then,
> > > > in the NAND helper, either there is no specific hook defined by a
> > > > manufacturer driver and you return -ENOTSUPP, or you execute the
> > > > defined hook. 
> > > 
> > > okay, patch specific manufacturer _lock/_unlock driver
> > > in nand_manufacturer_init();
> > > 
> > > and in the final of nand_scan_tail()
> > > if (!mtd->_lock)
> > >  mtd->_lock = NULL;
> > > if (!mtd->_unlock)
> > >  mtd->_unlock = NULL; 
> > 
> > 
> > I'm still considering of post_init() in nand_scan_tail() for
> > MTD layer default call-back function replacement because
> > there would be more call-back functions need it.
> > i.e., 
> > MTD->_lock/_unlokc
> > MTD->_suspend/_resume
> 
> Again, that's something that needs to be abstracted so that both the
> NAND manufacturer driver and the NAND controller driver can take
> appropriate actions on suspend/resume operations.
> 
> > NTD->_point/_unpoint
> 
> ->_point/_unpoint() are irrelevant for a NAND chip.
> 
> > ...
> > 
> > 
> > actually, my patch series are including MTD->_locl/_unlock and 
> > MTD->_suspend/_resume. how do you think ?
> 
> Miquel was suggesting to add nand_chip->{lock,unlock,is_locked}()
> methods that would be implemented by the NAND manufacturer drivers, and
> have generic wrappers implemented in nand_base.c:
> 
> static int nand_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> {
>    struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> 
>    if (!chip->lock)
>       return -ENOTSUPP;
> 
>    return chip->lock(chip, ofs, len);
> }
> 
> ...
> 
> If you do that, you won't need this post_init() hook.

got it, but ... 
user space program flash_lock/flash_unlock are calling 
mtd_lock() & mtd_unlock().
i.e.,
int mtd_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
{
         if (!mtd->_lock)
                 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
         if (ofs < 0 || ofs >= mtd->size || len > mtd->size - ofs)
                 return -EINVAL;
         if (!len)
                 return 0;
         return mtd->_lock(mtd, ofs, len);
}


thanks for your time & comments.
Mason


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information 
and/or personal data, which is protected by applicable laws. Please be 
reminded that duplication, disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail 
(and/or its attachments) or any part thereof is prohibited. If you receive 
this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this mail as 
well as its attachment(s) from your system. In addition, please be 
informed that collection, processing, and/or use of personal data is 
prohibited unless expressly permitted by personal data protection laws. 
Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Macronix International Co., Ltd.

=====================================================================



============================================================================

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information and/or personal data, which is protected by applicable laws. Please be reminded that duplication, disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail (and/or its attachments) or any part thereof is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this mail as well as its attachment(s) from your system. In addition, please be informed that collection, processing, and/or use of personal data is prohibited unless expressly permitted by personal data protection laws. Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Macronix International Co., Ltd.

=====================================================================