[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191021024049.uyit2zp24l6jqzf5@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 08:10:49 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nico@...xnic.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] cpufreq: merge arm_big_little and vexpress-spc
On 18-10-19, 11:37, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> +static struct platform_driver ve_spc_cpufreq_platdrv = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "vexpress-spc-cpufreq",
> + },
> + .probe = ve_spc_cpufreq_probe,
> + .remove = ve_spc_cpufreq_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(ve_spc_cpufreq_platdrv);
>
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>");
> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic ARM big LITTLE cpufreq driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Vexpress SPC ARM big LITTLE cpufreq driver");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
Strange. The -B option you used while generating the patch makes it
fails to get applied om my side with am -3. git doesn't get the rename
of file properly and shows me this conflict:
static int ve_spc_init_opp_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
{
@@@ -68,4 -697,7 +727,11 @@@ static struct platform_driver ve_spc_cp
};
module_platform_driver(ve_spc_cpufreq_platdrv);
++<<<<<<< HEAD
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
++=======
+ MODULE_AUTHOR("Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>");
+ MODULE_AUTHOR("Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>");
+ MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Vexpress SPC ARM big LITTLE cpufreq driver");
+ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
++>>>>>>> cpufreq: merge arm_big_little and vexpress-spc
Can you resend this patch (only) without the -B option ?
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists