lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CF33C36214C39B4496568E5578BE70C74031B9FD@PGSMSX108.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Oct 2019 02:47:34 +0000
From:   "Lu, Brent" <brent.lu@...el.com>
To:     "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
CC:     "Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "Zavras, Alexios" <alexios.zavras@...el.com>,
        "Kuninori Morimoto" <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ASoC: bdw-rt5677: enable runtime channel merge

> Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: bdw-rt5677: enable runtime channel merge
> 
> In the DAI link "Capture PCM", the FE DAI "Capture Pin" supports 4-channel
> capture but the BE DAI supports only 2-channel capture. To fix the channel
> mismatch, we need to enable the runtime channel merge for this DAI link.
> 

Hi Pierre,

This patch is for the same issue discussed in the following thread:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11134167/

We enable the runtime channel merge for the DMIC DAI instead of adding a
machine driver constraint. It's working good on chrome's 3.14 branch (which
requires some backport for the runtime channel merge feature). Please let
me know if this implementation is correct for the FE/BE mismatch problem.
Thanks.


Regards,
Brent

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ