[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191021104509.p2bsll3rwe7ica6t@holly.lan>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:45:09 +0100
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/9] backlight: gpio: explicitly set the direction of
the GPIO
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 10:35:50AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> The GPIO backlight driver currently requests the line 'as is', without
> acively setting its direction. This can lead to problems: if the line
> is in input mode by default, we won't be able to drive it later when
> updating the status and also reading its initial value doesn't make
> sense for backlight setting.
>
> Request the line 'as is' initially, so that we can read its value
> without affecting it but then change the direction to output explicitly
> when setting the initial brightness.
>
> Also: check the current direction and only read the value if it's output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Intent looks good to me but...
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
> index 3955b513f2f8..a36ac3a45b81 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c
> @@ -25,9 +25,8 @@ struct gpio_backlight {
> int def_value;
> };
>
> -static int gpio_backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)
> +static int gpio_backlight_get_curr_brightness(struct backlight_device *bl)
This function does not get the current brightness (e.g. what the
hardware is currently doing). Given we've just nuked the function that
*did* get the current brightness from the hardware this isn't an
acceptable name.
Would like something like calc_brightness() or get_next_brightness().
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists