linux-kernel

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <e5e7695cc82b4370752f45082be007dbe410c74c.camel@v3.sk>
Date:   Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:44:24 +0200
From:   Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, stephan@...hold.net,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
        James Cameron <quozl@...top.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Simplify MFD Core

On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 13:29 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:58 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > MFD currently has one over-complicated user.  CS5535 uses a mixture of
> > cell cloning, reference counting and subsystem-level call-backs to
> > achieve its goal of requesting an IO memory region only once across 3
> > consumers.  The same can be achieved by handling the region centrally
> > during the parent device's .probe() sequence.  Releasing can be handed
> > in a similar way during .remove().
> > 
> > While we're here, take the opportunity to provide some clean-ups and
> > error checking to issues noticed along the way.
> > 
> > This also paves the way for clean cell disabling via Device Tree being
> > discussed at [0]
> > 
> > [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/18/612.
> 
> As the CS5535 is primarily used on the OLPC XO1, it would be
> good to have someone test the series on such a machine.
> 
> I've added a few people to Cc that may be able to help test it, or
> know someone who can.
> 
> For the actual patches, see
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191021105822.20271-1-lee.jones@linaro.org/T/#t

Thanks for the pointer. I'd by happy to test this.

Which tree do the patches apply to?
Or, better, is there a tree with the patches applied that I could use?

Thanks
Lubo

> 
>     Arnd
> 
> > Lee Jones (9):
> >   mfd: cs5535-mfd: Use PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines and tidy error message
> >   mfd: cs5535-mfd: Remove mfd_cell->id hack
> >   mfd: cs5535-mfd: Request shared IO regions centrally
> >   mfd: cs5535-mfd: Register clients using their own dedicated MFD cell
> >     entries
> >   mfd: mfd-core: Remove mfd_clone_cell()
> >   x86: olpc: Remove invocation of MFD's .enable()/.disable() call-backs
> >   mfd: mfd-core: Protect against NULL call-back function pointer
> >   mfd: mfd-core: Remove usage counting for .{en,dis}able() call-backs
> >   mfd: mfd-core: Move pdev->mfd_cell creation back into mfd_add_device()
> > 
> >  arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc-xo1-pm.c |   6 --
> >  drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c             | 124 +++++++++++++--------------
> >  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c               | 113 ++++--------------------
> >  include/linux/mfd/core.h             |  20 -----
> >  4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 184 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives