[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89a91b79-63f9-2a2d-30aa-d4447f1cbc96@kontron.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:44:19 +0000
From: Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
To: "krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] ARM: dts: imx6ul-kontron-n6310: Move common SoM
nodes to a separate file
On 21.10.19 12:28, krzk@...nel.org wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 03:07:19PM +0000, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
>> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
>>
>> The Kontron N6311 and N6411 SoMs are very similar to N6310. In
>> preparation to add support for them, we move the common nodes to a
>> separate file imx6ul-kontron-n6x1x-som-common.dtsi.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
>> ---
>> .../boot/dts/imx6ul-kontron-n6310-som.dtsi | 95 +-------------
>> .../dts/imx6ul-kontron-n6x1x-som-common.dtsi | 123 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-kontron-n6x1x-som-common.dtsi
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-kontron-n6310-som.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-kontron-n6310-som.dtsi
>> index a896b2348dd2..47d3ce5d255f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-kontron-n6310-som.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-kontron-n6310-som.dtsi
>> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
>> */
>>
>> #include "imx6ul.dtsi"
>> -#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>> +#include "imx6ul-kontron-n6x1x-som-common.dtsi"
>>
>> / {
>> model = "Kontron N6310 SOM";
>> @@ -18,49 +18,7 @@
>> };
>> };
>>
>> -&ecspi2 {
>> - cs-gpios = <&gpio4 22 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> - pinctrl-names = "default";
>> - pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ecspi2>;
>> - status = "okay";
>> -
>> - spi-flash@0 {
>> - compatible = "mxicy,mx25v8035f", "jedec,spi-nor";
>> - spi-max-frequency = <50000000>;
>> - reg = <0>;
>> - };
>> -};
>> -
>> -&fec1 {
>> - pinctrl-names = "default";
>> - pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_enet1 &pinctrl_enet1_mdio>;
>> - phy-mode = "rmii";
>> - phy-handle = <ðphy1>;
>> - status = "okay";
>> -
>> - mdio {
>> - #address-cells = <1>;
>> - #size-cells = <0>;
>> -
>> - ethphy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
>> - reg = <1>;
>> - micrel,led-mode = <0>;
>> - clocks = <&clks IMX6UL_CLK_ENET_REF>;
>> - clock-names = "rmii-ref";
>> - };
>> - };
>> -};
>> -
>> -&fec2 {
>> - phy-mode = "rmii";
>> - status = "disabled";
>> -};
>> -
>> &qspi {
>> - pinctrl-names = "default";
>> - pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_qspi>;
>> - status = "okay";
>> -
>> spi-flash@0 {
>
> You left qspi and flash partitions here, while adding it later. It is
> not pure move then and some duplicated stuff remains.
Indeed, the spi-flash node is duplicated, as I forgot to remove it from
the common include file. I will change that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists