| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20191021130111.GI4365@dell>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:01:11 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, stephan@...hold.net,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
James Cameron <quozl@...top.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Simplify MFD Core
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 12:53 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 13:29 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:58 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > > MFD currently has one over-complicated user. CS5535 uses a mixture of
> > > > > cell cloning, reference counting and subsystem-level call-backs to
> > > > > achieve its goal of requesting an IO memory region only once across 3
> > > > > consumers. The same can be achieved by handling the region centrally
> > > > > during the parent device's .probe() sequence. Releasing can be handed
> > > > > in a similar way during .remove().
> > > > >
> > > > > While we're here, take the opportunity to provide some clean-ups and
> > > > > error checking to issues noticed along the way.
> > > > >
> > > > > This also paves the way for clean cell disabling via Device Tree being
> > > > > discussed at [0]
> > > > >
> > > > > [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/18/612.
> > > >
> > > > As the CS5535 is primarily used on the OLPC XO1, it would be
> > > > good to have someone test the series on such a machine.
> > > >
> > > > I've added a few people to Cc that may be able to help test it, or
> > > > know someone who can.
> > > >
> > > > For the actual patches, see
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191021105822.20271-1-lee.jones@linaro.org/T/#t
> > >
> > > Thanks for the pointer. I'd by happy to test this.
> > >
> > > Which tree do the patches apply to?
> > > Or, better, is there a tree with the patches applied that I could use?
> >
> > Ideal. Thank you.
> >
> > http://git.linaro.org/people/lee.jones/linux.git/log/?h=topic/mfd-remove-clone-cs5535-mfd
>
> Thanks. My boot attempt ends up in a panic [1]:
Ah yes, that makes sense.
I guess the subsystem doesn't like there being empty cells.
Please bear with me.
> [ 2.090943] cs5535-gpio cs5535-gpio: reserved resource region [io 0x1000-0x10ff]
> [ 2.129084] cs5535-mfgpt cs5535-mfgpt: reserved resource region [io 0x1800-0x183f]
> [ 2.173457] cs5535-mfgpt cs5535-mfgpt: 8 MFGPT timers available
> [ 2.200731] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000
> [ 2.210655] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 2.210655] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 2.210655] *pde = 00000000
> [ 2.210655] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT
> [ 2.210655] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.4.0-rc3-00013-gd8518b1ac7282 #17
> [ 2.210655] Hardware name: OLPC XO/XO, BIOS OLPC Ver 1.00.01 10/16/2019
> [ 2.210655] EIP: strlen+0xb/0x17
> [ 2.210655] Code: c3 55 89 e5 56 89 c6 89 d0 88 c4 ac 38 e0 74 09 84 c0 75 f7 be 01 00 00 00 89 f0 48 5e 5d c3 55 89 e5 83 c9 ff 57 89 c7 31 c0 <f2> ae b8 fe ff ff ff 5f 29 c8 5d c3 85 c9 74 17 55 89 e5 57 89 c7
> [ 2.210655] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: ffffffff EDX: ffffffff
> [ 2.210655] ESI: c0d214a0 EDI: 00000000 EBP: ce487dd8 ESP: ce487dd4
> [ 2.210655] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010246
> [ 2.210655] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00000000 CR3: 00e08000 CR4: 00000090
> [ 2.210655] Call Trace:
> [ 2.210655] platform_device_alloc+0x11/0xb2
> [ 2.210655] mfd_add_devices+0x3c/0x285
> [ 2.210655] cs5535_mfd_probe+0x95/0x159
> [ 2.210655] ? cs5535_mfd_remove+0x2e/0x2e
> [ 2.210655] pci_device_probe+0x83/0xe9
> [ 2.210655] really_probe+0x16f/0x335
> [ 2.210655] driver_probe_device+0x113/0x148
> [ 2.210655] device_driver_attach+0x2e/0x41
> [ 2.210655] __driver_attach+0xe4/0xee
> [ 2.210655] ? device_driver_attach+0x41/0x41
> [ 2.210655] bus_for_each_dev+0x54/0x81
> [ 2.210655] driver_attach+0x14/0x16
> [ 2.210655] ? device_driver_attach+0x41/0x41
> [ 2.210655] bus_add_driver+0xe9/0x190
> [ 2.210655] ? max8925_i2c_init+0x2a/0x2a
> [ 2.210655] driver_register+0x87/0xb9
> [ 2.210655] ? max8925_i2c_init+0x2a/0x2a
> [ 2.210655] __pci_register_driver+0x37/0x3a
> [ 2.210655] cs5535_mfd_driver_init+0x14/0x16
> [ 2.210655] do_one_initcall+0x78/0x169
> [ 2.210655] ? do_early_param+0x75/0x75
> [ 2.210655] kernel_init_freeable+0xe6/0x16d
> [ 2.210655] ? rest_init+0x8e/0x8e
> [ 2.210655] kernel_init+0x8/0xd5
> [ 2.210655] ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x38
> [ 2.210655] Modules linked in:
> [ 2.210655] CR2: 0000000000000000
> [ 2.210655] ---[ end trace b02c575c8463e16f ]---
> [ 2.210655] EIP: strlen+0xb/0x17
> [ 2.210655] Code: c3 55 89 e5 56 89 c6 89 d0 88 c4 ac 38 e0 74 09 84 c0 75 f7 be 01 00 00 00 89 f0 48 5e 5d c3 55 89 e5 83 c9 ff 57 89 c7 31 c0 <f2> ae b8 fe ff ff ff 5f 29 c8 5d c3 85 c9 74 17 55 89 e5 57 89 c7
> [ 2.210655] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: ffffffff EDX: ffffffff
> [ 2.210655] ESI: c0d214a0 EDI: 00000000 EBP: ce487dd8 ESP: ce487dd4
> [ 2.210655] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010246
> [ 2.210655] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00000000 CR3: 00e08000 CR4: 00000090
> [ 4.012823] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00000009
> [ 4.022771] Kernel Offset: 0x0 from 0xc0400000 (relocation range: 0xc0000000-0xcf3fffff)
> [ 4.022771] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00000009 ]---
>
> [1] http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/mfp.txt
>
> Also:
>
> There's a build warning, caused by "x86: olpc: Remove invocation of
> MFD's .enable()/.disable() call-backs" I suppose:
>
> arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc-xo1-pm.c: In function ‘xo1_pm_probe’:
> arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc-xo1-pm.c:123:6: warning: unused variable ‘err’ [-Wunused-variable]
> 123 | int err;
> | ^~~
>
> I didn't look further into it. I'm happy to do so if necessary or try
> out a fix.
>
> Take care
> Lubo
>
> >
> > > > > Lee Jones (9):
> > > > > mfd: cs5535-mfd: Use PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines and tidy error message
> > > > > mfd: cs5535-mfd: Remove mfd_cell->id hack
> > > > > mfd: cs5535-mfd: Request shared IO regions centrally
> > > > > mfd: cs5535-mfd: Register clients using their own dedicated MFD cell
> > > > > entries
> > > > > mfd: mfd-core: Remove mfd_clone_cell()
> > > > > x86: olpc: Remove invocation of MFD's .enable()/.disable() call-backs
> > > > > mfd: mfd-core: Protect against NULL call-back function pointer
> > > > > mfd: mfd-core: Remove usage counting for .{en,dis}able() call-backs
> > > > > mfd: mfd-core: Move pdev->mfd_cell creation back into mfd_add_device()
> > > > >
> > > > > arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc-xo1-pm.c | 6 --
> > > > > drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c | 124 +++++++++++++--------------
> > > > > drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 113 ++++--------------------
> > > > > include/linux/mfd/core.h | 20 -----
> > > > > 4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 184 deletions(-)
> > > > >
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists