[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <760679a0a6fef6041b0e7bec8d04d81f@www.loen.fr>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:05:57 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář
<rkrcmar@...hat.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] arm/arm64: Provide a wrapper for SMCCC 1.1 calls
On 2019-10-21 14:43, Steven Price wrote:
> On 21/10/2019 12:42, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 2019-10-11 13:59, Steven Price wrote:
> [...]
>> All this should most probably go on top of the SMCCC conduit cleanup
>> that
>> has already been already queued in the arm64 tree (see
>> arm64/for-next/smccc-conduit-cleanup).
>
> Good point, I'll rebase. Are you happy for the entire series to be
> based
> on top of that? i.e. based on commit e6ea46511b1a ("firmware:
> arm_sdei:
> use common SMCCC_CONDUIT_*")
Absolutely. I'll sync with Will and Catalin to get a stable branch that
includes these commits.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists