lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFoBYchP96hv=7XfTo8CrCSD+KC0h_oFRAsOYT-Lc1SFZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:32:49 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc:     "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: renesas_sdhi: add checks for pinctrl_lookup_state

On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 15:13, Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com> wrote:
>
> renesas_sdhi_probe misses checks for pinctrl_lookup_state and may miss
> failures.
> Add checks for them to fix the problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> index d4ada5cca2d1..dc5ad6632df3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> @@ -694,8 +694,13 @@ int renesas_sdhi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>         if (!IS_ERR(priv->pinctrl)) {
>                 priv->pins_default = pinctrl_lookup_state(priv->pinctrl,
>                                                 PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT);
> +               if (IS_ERR(priv->pins_default))
> +                       return PTR_ERR(priv->pins_default);
> +
>                 priv->pins_uhs = pinctrl_lookup_state(priv->pinctrl,
>                                                 "state_uhs");
> +               if (IS_ERR(priv->pins_uhs))
> +                       return PTR_ERR(priv->pins_uhs);
>         }

This looks correct to me, as I guess if there is a pinctrl specified
for device node of the controller, it means that it should be used!?

I understand that this is only used for those variants that supports
UHS-I via the renesas_sdhi_start_signal_voltage_switch(). Wolfram, is
this fine you think?

>
>         host = tmio_mmc_host_alloc(pdev, mmc_data);
> --
> 2.20.1
>

Kind regards
Uffe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ