[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2175c2cd-2c1e-22e8-2f67-3fc334ef2a40@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:28:31 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
vkuznets@...hat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
ak@...ux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@...el.com, kan.liang@...el.com,
like.xu@...el.com, ehankland@...gle.com, arbel.moshe@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: x86/vPMU: Add lazy mechanism to release
perf_event per vPMC
On 21/10/19 16:04, Like Xu wrote:
>
>>
>> 2) introduce a new callback msr_idx_to_pmc that returns a struct
>> kvm_pmc*, and change kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr to do
>
> For callback msr_idx_to_pmc,
> how do we deal with the input 'MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL'
> which may return several fixed kvm_pmcs not just one?
For RDMSR, do not do anything. For WRMSR, you can handle it in the
set_msr callback.
>>
>> static int kvm_pmu_mark_pmc_in_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
>
> s/static int/static void/.
>
>> {
>> struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
>> struct kvm_pmc *pmc = kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->msr_idx_to_pmc(vcpu, msr);
>
> We need 'if(pmc)' here.
Agreed, sorry for the sloppiness. Never interpret my suggestions as
more than pseudocode. :)
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists