[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB2710879535971E290E8B25D3B3680@BYAPR12MB2710.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 23:48:55 +0000
From: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@...dia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>
CC: "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
"Yu-Huan Hsu" <YHsu@...dia.com>, Sachin Nikam <Snikam@...dia.com>,
Pritesh Raithatha <praithatha@...dia.com>,
Timo Alho <talho@...dia.com>,
Alexander Van Brunt <avanbrunt@...dia.com>,
"thomasz@...dia.com" <thomasz@...dia.com>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
Juha Tukkinen <jtukkinen@...dia.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 0/7] Nvidia Arm SMMUv2 Implementation
Hi Robin,
>>Apologies for crossed wires, but I had a series getting rid of arm_smmu_flush_ops which was also meant to end up making things a bit easier for you:
I was looking to rebase on top of your changes first. Then I read Will's reply that said your work is queued for 5.5.
Let me know if these patches need to rebased on top of iommu/devel or a different branch. I can resend the patch set on top of necessary branch.
-KR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists