[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191022021306.GB2479@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 19:13:06 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Micah Morton <mortonm@...omium.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID LSM changes for 5.4
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 08:58:11AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > @@ -383,20 +383,22 @@ do { \
> > } while (0)
> >
> > /**
> > - * rcu_swap_protected() - swap an RCU and a regular pointer
> > - * @rcu_ptr: RCU pointer
> > + * rcu_replace() - replace an RCU pointer, returning its old value
> > + * @rcu_ptr: RCU pointer, whose old value is returned
> > * @ptr: regular pointer
> > - * @c: the conditions under which the dereference will take place
> > + * @c: the lockdep conditions under which the dereference will take place
> > *
> > - * Perform swap(@rcu_ptr, @ptr) where @rcu_ptr is an RCU-annotated pointer and
> > - * @c is the argument that is passed to the rcu_dereference_protected() call
> > - * used to read that pointer.
> > + * Perform a replacement, where @rcu_ptr is an RCU-annotated
> > + * pointer and @c is the lockdep argument that is passed to the
> > + * rcu_dereference_protected() call used to read that pointer. The old
> > + * value of @rcu_ptr is returned, and @rcu_ptr is set to @ptr.
> > */
> > -#define rcu_swap_protected(rcu_ptr, ptr, c) do { \
> > +#define rcu_replace(rcu_ptr, ptr, c) \
> > +({ \
> > typeof(ptr) __tmp = rcu_dereference_protected((rcu_ptr), (c)); \
> > rcu_assign_pointer((rcu_ptr), (ptr)); \
> > - (ptr) = __tmp; \
> > -} while (0)
> > + __tmp; \
> > +})
>
> One small suggestion, would it make sense to name it "rcu_replace_pointer()"?
>
> This would make it fit into the pointer handling family of RCU functions:
> rcu_assign_pointer(), rcu_access_pointer(), RCU_INIT_POINTER() et al?
Easy enough to make the change. I will do that tomorrow and test over
the following night.
> rcu_swap() would also look a bit weird if used in MM code. ;-)
How much RCU swap should we configure on this system? About same amount
as reader-writer swap! ;-)
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists