[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68d6da35-276c-0491-99ea-8249dee8fd1d@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:17:24 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Memory offlining + page isolation cleanups
On 22.10.19 11:14, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 22-10-19 10:32:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> [...]
>> E.g., arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:kvm_is_mmio_pfn()
>
> Thanks for these references. I am not really familiar with kvm so I
> cannot really comment on the specific code but I am wondering why
> it simply doesn't check for ZONE_DEVICE explicitly? Also we do care
> about holes in RAM (from the early boot), those should be reserved
> already AFAIR. So we are left with hotplugged memory with holes and
> I am not really sure we should bother with this until there is a clear
> usecase in sight.
Well, checking for ZONE_DEVICE is only possible if you have an
initialized memmap. And that is not guaranteed when you start mapping
random stuff into your guest via /dev/mem.
I am reworking these patches right now and audit the whole kernel for
PageReserved() checks that might affect ZONE_DEVICE. I'll send the
collection of patches as RFC.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists