[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191022144207.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:42:07 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>, nd <nd@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"james qian wang (Arm Technology China)" <james.qian.wang@....com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Mihail Atanassov <Mihail.Atanassov@....com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Subject: Re: [RFC,3/3] drm/komeda: Allow non-component drm_bridge only
endpoints
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:50:42AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:48 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > I had a patches, which is why I raised the problem with the core:
> >
> > 6961edfee26d bridge hacks using device links
> >
> > but it never went further than an experiment at the time because of the
> > problems in the core. As it was a hack, it never got posted. Seems
> > that kernel tree (for the cubox) is still 5.2 based, so has a lot of
> > patches and might need updating to a more recent base before anything
> > can be tested.
>
>
> For reference, the panel patch:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10364873/
>
> And the huge discussion around bridges, that resulted in Rafael
> Wyzocki fixing all the core issues:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg201927.html
>
> James, do you want to look into this for bridges?
I can now confirm that it does work.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists