[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191022162134.fpawonjdjvd5kxza@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:21:34 -0500
From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/3] ARM: dts: am43xx: add support for clkout1 clock
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote on Tue [2019-Oct-22 08:48:16 -0700]:
> * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com> [191016 18:47]:
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am43xx-clocks.dtsi
> > @@ -704,6 +704,60 @@
> > ti,bit-shift = <8>;
> > reg = <0x2a48>;
> > };
> > +
> > + clkout1_osc_div_ck: clkout1_osc_div_ck {
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > + compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
> > + clocks = <&sys_clkin_ck>;
> > + ti,bit-shift = <20>;
> > + ti,max-div = <4>;
> > + reg = <0x4100>;
> > + };
>
> Here too please describe why the clock names are not generic.
Tero originally had this patch in the kernel so this is somewhat of a
revert. Since these "clock" were removed. If the name syntax is no longer
valid for some reason, then I will need a little more informations to
proceed.
Tero, can you assist here?
Benoit
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists