lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1571762798-25900-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:46:38 +0200
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     pauld@...hat.com, valentin.schneider@....com,
        srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, quentin.perret@....com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com,
        hdanton@...a.com, parth@...ux.ibm.com, riel@...riel.com,
        rong.a.chen@...el.com, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: fix rework of find_idlest_group()

The task, for which the scheduler looks for the idlest group of CPUs, must
be discounted from all statistics in order to get a fair comparison
between groups. This includes utilization, load, nr_running and idle_cpus.

Such unfairness can be easily highlighted with the unixbench execl 1 task.
This test continuously call execve() and the scheduler looks for the idlest
group/CPU on which it should place the task. Because the task runs on the
local group/CPU, the latter seems already busy even if there is nothing
else running on it. As a result, the scheduler will always select another
group/CPU than the local one.

Fixes: 57abff067a08 ("sched/fair: Rework find_idlest_group()")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
---

This recover most of the perf regression on my system and I have asked
Rong if he can rerun the test with the patch to check that it fixes his
system as well.

 kernel/sched/fair.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a81c364..0ad4b21 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5379,6 +5379,36 @@ static unsigned long cpu_load(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	return cfs_rq_load_avg(&rq->cfs);
 }
+/*
+ * cpu_load_without - compute cpu load without any contributions from *p
+ * @cpu: the CPU which load is requested
+ * @p: the task which load should be discounted
+ *
+ * The load of a CPU is defined by the load of tasks currently enqueued on that
+ * CPU as well as tasks which are currently sleeping after an execution on that
+ * CPU.
+ *
+ * This method returns the load of the specified CPU by discounting the load of
+ * the specified task, whenever the task is currently contributing to the CPU
+ * load.
+ */
+static unsigned long cpu_load_without(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+	unsigned int load;
+
+	/* Task has no contribution or is new */
+	if (cpu_of(rq) != task_cpu(p) || !READ_ONCE(p->se.avg.last_update_time))
+		return cpu_load(rq);
+
+	cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
+	load = READ_ONCE(cfs_rq->avg.load_avg);
+
+	/* Discount task's util from CPU's util */
+	lsub_positive(&load, task_h_load(p));
+
+	return load;
+}
 
 static unsigned long capacity_of(int cpu)
 {
@@ -8117,10 +8147,55 @@ static inline enum fbq_type fbq_classify_rq(struct rq *rq)
 struct sg_lb_stats;
 
 /*
+ * task_running_on_cpu - return 1 if @p is running on @cpu.
+ */
+
+static unsigned int task_running_on_cpu(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	/* Task has no contribution or is new */
+	if (cpu != task_cpu(p) || !READ_ONCE(p->se.avg.last_update_time))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (task_on_rq_queued(p))
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * idle_cpu_without - would a given CPU be idle without p ?
+ * @cpu: the processor on which idleness is tested.
+ * @p: task which should be ignored.
+ *
+ * Return: 1 if the CPU would be idle. 0 otherwise.
+ */
+static int idle_cpu_without(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+
+	if ((rq->curr != rq->idle) && (rq->curr != p))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * rq->nr_running can't be used but an updated version without the
+	 * impact of p on cpu must be used instead. The updated nr_running
+	 * be computed and tested before calling idle_cpu_without().
+	 */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	if (!llist_empty(&rq->wake_list))
+		return 0;
+#endif
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+/*
  * update_sg_wakeup_stats - Update sched_group's statistics for wakeup.
- * @denv: The ched_domain level to look for idlest group.
+ * @sd: The sched_domain level to look for idlest group.
  * @group: sched_group whose statistics are to be updated.
  * @sgs: variable to hold the statistics for this group.
+ * @p: The task for which we look for the idlest group/CPU.
  */
 static inline void update_sg_wakeup_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
 					  struct sched_group *group,
@@ -8133,21 +8208,22 @@ static inline void update_sg_wakeup_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
 
 	for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_span(group)) {
 		struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
+		unsigned int local;
 
-		sgs->group_load += cpu_load(rq);
+		sgs->group_load += cpu_load_without(rq, p);
 		sgs->group_util += cpu_util_without(i, p);
-		sgs->sum_h_nr_running += rq->cfs.h_nr_running;
+		local = task_running_on_cpu(i, p);
+		sgs->sum_h_nr_running += rq->cfs.h_nr_running - local;
 
-		nr_running = rq->nr_running;
+		nr_running = rq->nr_running - local;
 		sgs->sum_nr_running += nr_running;
 
 		/*
-		 * No need to call idle_cpu() if nr_running is not 0
+		 * No need to call idle_cpu_without() if nr_running is not 0
 		 */
-		if (!nr_running && idle_cpu(i))
+		if (!nr_running && idle_cpu_without(i, p))
 			sgs->idle_cpus++;
 
-
 	}
 
 	/* Check if task fits in the group */
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ