[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191022165054.48302-1-natechancellor@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:50:54 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: sunxi: Fix operator precedence in sunxi_divs_clk_setup
r375326 in Clang exposes an issue with operator precedence in
sunxi_div_clk_setup:
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: warning: operator '?:' has lower
precedence than '|'; '|' will be evaluated first
[-Wbitwise-conditional-parentheses]
data->div[i].critical ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: note: place parentheses around
the '|' expression to silence this warning
data->div[i].critical ?
^
)
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: note: place parentheses around
the '?:' expression to evaluate it first
data->div[i].critical ?
^
(
1 warning generated.
It appears that the intention was for ?: to be evaluated first so that
CLK_IS_CRITICAL could be added to clkflags if the critical boolean was
set; right now, | is being evaluated first. Add parentheses around the
?: block to have it be evaluated first.
Fixes: 9919d44ff297 ("clk: sunxi: Use CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for critical clks")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/745
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
---
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
index d3a43381a792..27201fd26e44 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
@@ -1080,8 +1080,8 @@ static struct clk ** __init sunxi_divs_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
rate_hw, rate_ops,
gate_hw, &clk_gate_ops,
clkflags |
- data->div[i].critical ?
- CLK_IS_CRITICAL : 0);
+ (data->div[i].critical ?
+ CLK_IS_CRITICAL : 0));
WARN_ON(IS_ERR(clk_data->clks[i]));
}
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists