lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bcc3035b-b50c-231f-23b3-b3f03b2b46a7@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:04:38 +0800
From:   "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per
 block for stdio



On 10/22/2019 12:08 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 01:33:48PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
>> +			cycles += bi->cycles_aggr / bi->num_aggr;
>> +
>> +			he_block = hists__add_entry_block(&bh->block_hists,
>> +							  &al, bi);
>> +			if (!he_block) {
>> +				block_info__put(bi);
>> +				return -1;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (block_cycles)
>> +		*block_cycles += cycles;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int resort_cb(struct hist_entry *he, void *arg __maybe_unused)
>> +{
>> +	/* Skip the calculation of column length in output_resort */
>> +	he->filtered = true;
> 
> that's a nasty hack ;-) together with setting it back to false just below
> 
> why do you want to skip the columns calculation? we could add those columns
> to the output as well no?
> 
> jirka
> 

The columns calculation for this case causes the crash. The current 
columns calculation requires some information but we don't provide. So I 
just want to skip the columns calculation.

OK, I will check how to avoid this nasty hack.

Thanks
Jin Yao

>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void hists__clear_filtered(struct hists *hists)
>> +{
>> +	struct rb_node *next = rb_first_cached(&hists->entries);
>> +	struct hist_entry *he;
>> +
>> +	while (next) {
>> +		he = rb_entry(next, struct hist_entry, rb_node);
>> +		he->filtered = false;
>> +		next = rb_next(&he->rb_node);
>> +	}
>> +}
> 
> SNIP
> 
> jirka
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ