[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c57cd8b-d797-f2a9-0235-792a0e730090@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 21:34:39 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
CC: <vigneshr@...com>, <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
<jonas@...rbonn.se>, <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<andrew@...id.au>, <richard@....at>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <vz@...ia.com>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <joel@....id.au>,
<miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<computersforpeace@...il.com>, <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/22] mtd: spi-nor: Rename nor->params to nor->flash
On 10/10/2019 10:05 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> External E-Mail
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:46:03 +0000
> <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Rename nor->params to nor->flash for a clearer separation
>> between the controller and flash operations.
>
> Hm, I'm not sure 'flash' is clearer than 'params', and the spi_nor
> object is supposed to represent the NOR chip anyway, so it was pretty
> clear to me that nor->params were the NOR flash parameters not the
> NOR controller ones.
> If I had anything to change it would be s/params/properties/ (and
> s/spi_nor_flash_parameter/spi_nor_properties/) since those parameters
> look like immutable information discovered during the NOR detection,
> but I'm nitpicking here.
>
I'll drop this for now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists