lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191023214325.GA30290@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:43:25 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>
Cc:     linux@...lesssm.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/MSI: Fix restoring of MSI-X vector control's mask bit

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 04:12:35PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 11:42:39AM +0800, Jian-Hong Pan wrote:
> > MSI-X vector control's bit 0 is the mask bit, which masks the
> > corresponding interrupt request, or not. Other reserved bits might be
> > used for other purpose by device vendors. For example, the values of
> > Kingston NVMe SSD's MSI-X vector control are neither 0, nor 1, but other
> > values [1].
> > 
> > The original restoring logic in system resuming uses the whole MSI-X
> > vector control value as the flag to set/clear the mask bit. However,
> > this logic conflicts the idea mentioned above. It may mislead system to
> > disable the MSI-X vector entries. That makes system get no interrupt
> > from Kingston NVMe SSD after resume and usually get NVMe I/O timeout
> > error.
> > 
> > [  174.715534] nvme nvme0: I/O 978 QID 3 timeout, completion polled
> > 
> > This patch takes only the mask bit of original MSI-X vector control
> > value as the flag to fix this issue.
> > 
> > [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204887#c8
> > 
> > Buglink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204887
> > Fixed: f2440d9acbe8 ("PCI MSI: Refactor interrupt masking code")
> > Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/msi.c | 7 +++++--
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> > index 0884bedcfc7a..deae3d5acaf6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> > @@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ static void __pci_restore_msi_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  static void __pci_restore_msix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct msi_desc *entry;
> > +	u32 flag;
> >  
> >  	if (!dev->msix_enabled)
> >  		return;
> > @@ -444,8 +445,10 @@ static void __pci_restore_msix_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  				PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE | PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL);
> >  
> >  	arch_restore_msi_irqs(dev);
> > -	for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev)
> > -		msix_mask_irq(entry, entry->masked);
> > +	for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) {
> > +		flag = entry->masked & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT;
> > +		msix_mask_irq(entry, flag);
> 
> This makes good sense: before your patch, when we restore, we set the
> mask bit if *any* bits in the Vector Control register are set.
> 
> There are other paths leading to __pci_msix_desc_mask_irq(), so I
> think it would be better to do the masking there, e.g.,
> 
>   if (flag & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT)
>     mask_bits |= PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT;
> 
> I think the other paths all pass either 0 or 1, so they're all safe
> today.  But doing the masking in __pci_msix_desc_mask_irq() removes
> that assumption from the callers.
> 
> I applied the patch below to pci/msi, let me know if it doesn't work
> for you.
> 
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	pci_msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL, 0);
> >  }
> 
> commit 1a828a554650
> Author: Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>
> Date:   Tue Oct 8 11:42:39 2019 +0800
> 
>     PCI/MSI: Fix incorrect MSI-X masking on resume
>     
>     When a driver enables MSI-X, msix_program_entries() reads the MSI-X Vector
>     Control register for each vector and saves it in desc->masked.  Each
>     register is 32 bits and bit 0 is the actual Mask bit.
>     
>     When we restored these registers during resume, we previously set the Mask
>     bit if *any* bit in desc->masked was set instead of when the Mask bit
>     itself was set:
>     
>       pci_restore_state
>         pci_restore_msi_state
>           __pci_restore_msix_state
>             for_each_pci_msi_entry
>               msix_mask_irq(entry, entry->masked)   <-- entire u32 word
>                 __pci_msix_desc_mask_irq(desc, flag)
>                   mask_bits = desc->masked & ~PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT
>                   if (flag)       <-- testing entire u32, not just bit 0
>                     mask_bits |= PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT
>                   writel(mask_bits, desc_addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL)
>     
>     This means that after resume, MSI-X vectors were masked when they shouldn't
>     be, which leads to timeouts like this:
>     
>       nvme nvme0: I/O 978 QID 3 timeout, completion polled
>     
>     On resume, set the Mask bit only when the saved Mask bit from suspend was
>     set.
>     
>     This should remove the need for 19ea025e1d28 ("nvme: Add quirk for Kingston
>     NVME SSD running FW E8FK11.T").
>     
>     [bhelgaas: commit log, move fix to __pci_msix_desc_mask_irq()]
>     Fixes: f2440d9acbe8 ("PCI MSI: Refactor interrupt masking code")
>     Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204887
>     Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191008034238.2503-1-jian-hong@endlessm.com
>     Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>

I forgot; this probably should be marked for stable, too.

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index 0884bedcfc7a..771041784e64 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -213,12 +213,13 @@ u32 __pci_msix_desc_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
>  
>  	if (pci_msi_ignore_mask)
>  		return 0;
> +
>  	desc_addr = pci_msix_desc_addr(desc);
>  	if (!desc_addr)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	mask_bits &= ~PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT;
> -	if (flag)
> +	if (flag & PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT)
>  		mask_bits |= PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT;
>  
>  	writel(mask_bits, desc_addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-nvme mailing list
> Linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ