[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35e5a15c-5513-9c0d-6fdd-df06f8c95450@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 08:28:51 +0300
From: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, <kishon@...com>
CC: <aniljoy@...ence.com>, <adouglas@...ence.com>, <nsekhar@...com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] phy: ti: j721e-wiz: Manage typec-gpio-dir
On 22/10/2019 16:22, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Based on this GPIO state we need to configure LN10
> bit to swap lane0 and lane1 if required (flipped connector).
>
> Type-C companions typically need some time after the cable is
> plugged before and before they reflect the correct status of
> Type-C plug orientation on the DIR line.
>
> Type-C Spec specifies CC attachment debounce time (tCCDebounce)
> of 100 ms (min) to 200 ms (max).
>
> Use the DT property to figure out if we need to add delay
> or not before sampling the Type-C DIR line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
> ---
> drivers/phy/ti/phy-j721e-wiz.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/ti/phy-j721e-wiz.c b/drivers/phy/ti/phy-j721e-wiz.c
> index 2a95da843e9f..2becdbcb762a 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/ti/phy-j721e-wiz.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/ti/phy-j721e-wiz.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> #include <dt-bindings/phy/phy.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mux/consumer.h>
> @@ -22,6 +24,7 @@
> #define WIZ_SERDES_CTRL 0x404
> #define WIZ_SERDES_TOP_CTRL 0x408
> #define WIZ_SERDES_RST 0x40c
> +#define WIZ_SERDES_TYPEC 0x410
> #define WIZ_LANECTL(n) (0x480 + (0x40 * (n)))
>
> #define WIZ_MAX_LANES 4
> @@ -29,6 +32,8 @@
> #define WIZ_DIV_NUM_CLOCKS_16G 2
> #define WIZ_DIV_NUM_CLOCKS_10G 1
>
> +#define WIZ_SERDES_TYPEC_LN10_SWAP BIT(30)
> +
> enum wiz_lane_standard_mode {
> LANE_MODE_GEN1,
> LANE_MODE_GEN2,
> @@ -206,6 +211,8 @@ struct wiz {
> u32 num_lanes;
> struct platform_device *serdes_pdev;
> struct reset_controller_dev wiz_phy_reset_dev;
> + struct gpio_desc *gpio_typec_dir;
> + int typec_dir_delay;
> };
>
> static int wiz_reset(struct wiz *wiz)
> @@ -703,6 +710,21 @@ static int wiz_phy_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> struct wiz *wiz = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int ret;
>
> + /* if typec-dir gpio was specified, set LN10 SWAP bit based on that */
> + if (id == 0 && wiz->gpio_typec_dir) {
> + if (wiz->typec_dir_delay)
> + msleep_interruptible(wiz->typec_dir_delay);
> +
> + if (gpiod_get_value_cansleep(wiz->gpio_typec_dir)) {
> + regmap_update_bits(wiz->regmap, WIZ_SERDES_TYPEC,
> + WIZ_SERDES_TYPEC_LN10_SWAP,
> + WIZ_SERDES_TYPEC_LN10_SWAP);
A nit pick, but wouldn't it be more coherent with the rest of the driver
to define a REG_FIELD also for TYPEC_LN10_SWAP bit?
> + } else {
> + regmap_update_bits(wiz->regmap, WIZ_SERDES_TYPEC,
> + WIZ_SERDES_TYPEC_LN10_SWAP, 0);
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (id == 0) {
> ret = regmap_field_write(wiz->phy_reset_n, true);
> return ret;
> @@ -789,6 +811,25 @@ static int wiz_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto err_addr_to_resource;
> }
>
> + wiz->gpio_typec_dir = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "typec-dir",
> + GPIOD_IN);
> + if (IS_ERR(wiz->gpio_typec_dir)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(wiz->gpio_typec_dir);
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to request typec-dir gpio: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + goto err_addr_to_resource;
> + }
> +
> + if (wiz->gpio_typec_dir) {
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "typec-dir-debounce",
> + &wiz->typec_dir_delay);
> + if (ret && ret != -EINVAL) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid typec-dir-debounce property\n");
> + goto err_addr_to_resource;
> + }
> + }
> +
> wiz->dev = dev;
> wiz->regmap = regmap;
> wiz->num_lanes = num_lanes;
>
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists