[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32bc288e-dbbb-8930-4750-826e9e17d58c@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:10:09 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] dt-bindings: phy-mtk-tphy: add a new reference
clock
Hi Rob,
On 18/09/19 1:58 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:14:51 +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
>> Usually the digital and analog phys use the same reference clock,
>> but on some platforms, they are separated, so add another optional
>> clock to support it.
>> In order to keep the clock names consistent with PHY IP's, use
>> the da_ref for analog phy and ref clock for digital phy.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
>> ---
>> v2: fix typo of analog and needed
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-mtk-tphy.txt | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
I see you've acked a couple of patches in the series. However the other
dt-binding patch neither has an Ack or NAK. Is there a specific reason or can I
merge the series?
Thanks
Kishon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists