[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2cd566ee-0467-1e06-98dd-aacb3ca42e76@web.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 09:24:00 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Stephen McCamant <smccaman@....edu>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers: Fix error handling in
ttc_setup_clocksource
> In the implementation of ttc_setup_clocksource() when
> clk_notifier_register() fails the execution should go to error handling.
> Additionally, to avoid memory leak the allocated memory for ttccs should
> be released, too.
I got other wording preferences. Thus I imagine that such a change
description can still be improved another bit.
How do you think about to omit the word “should” for describing
the previous software situation?
> So, goto error handling to release the memory and return.
Would you like to express the addition of a jump target (according to
the Linux coding style) for the completion of desired exception handling
in a different way?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists