[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191023005129.GC100970@otc-nc-03>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 17:51:29 -0700
From: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] iommu/vt-d: Add custom allocator for IOASID
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:53:15PM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> When VT-d driver runs in the guest, PASID allocation must be
> performed via virtual command interface. This patch registers a
> custom IOASID allocator which takes precedence over the default
> XArray based allocator. The resulting IOASID allocation will always
> come from the host. This ensures that PASID namespace is system-
> wide.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/intel-iommu.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> index fd50ddffffbf..961fe5795a90 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ config INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> bool "Support for Shared Virtual Memory with Intel IOMMU"
> depends on INTEL_IOMMU && X86
> select PCI_PASID
> + select IOASID
> select MMU_NOTIFIER
> help
> Shared Virtual Memory (SVM) provides a facility for devices
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index 3f974919d3bd..3aff0141c522 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -1706,6 +1706,8 @@ static void free_dmar_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> if (ecap_prs(iommu->ecap))
> intel_svm_finish_prq(iommu);
> }
> + ioasid_unregister_allocator(&iommu->pasid_allocator);
> +
> #endif
> }
>
> @@ -4910,6 +4912,46 @@ static int __init probe_acpi_namespace_devices(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
Maybe move them to intel-svm.c instead? that's where the bulk
of the svm support is?
> +static ioasid_t intel_ioasid_alloc(ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max, void *data)
> +{
> + struct intel_iommu *iommu = data;
> + ioasid_t ioasid;
> +
> + /*
> + * VT-d virtual command interface always uses the full 20 bit
> + * PASID range. Host can partition guest PASID range based on
> + * policies but it is out of guest's control.
> + */
> + if (min < PASID_MIN || max > PASID_MAX)
> + return INVALID_IOASID;
What are these PASID_MIN/MAX? Do you check if these are within the
limits supported by the iommu/vIOMMU as its enumerated?
> +
> + if (vcmd_alloc_pasid(iommu, &ioasid))
> + return INVALID_IOASID;
> +
> + return ioasid;
> +}
> +
> +static void intel_ioasid_free(ioasid_t ioasid, void *data)
> +{
> + struct iommu_pasid_alloc_info *svm;
> + struct intel_iommu *iommu = data;
> +
> + if (!iommu)
> + return;
> + /*
> + * Sanity check the ioasid owner is done at upper layer, e.g. VFIO
> + * We can only free the PASID when all the devices are unbond.
> + */
> + svm = ioasid_find(NULL, ioasid, NULL);
> + if (!svm) {
> + pr_warn("Freeing unbond IOASID %d\n", ioasid);
> + return;
> + }
> + vcmd_free_pasid(iommu, ioasid);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> int __init intel_iommu_init(void)
> {
> int ret = -ENODEV;
> @@ -5020,6 +5062,31 @@ int __init intel_iommu_init(void)
> "%s", iommu->name);
> iommu_device_set_ops(&iommu->iommu, &intel_iommu_ops);
> iommu_device_register(&iommu->iommu);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> + if (cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap) && sm_supported(iommu)) {
do you need to check against cap_caching_mode() or ecap_vcmd?
> + /*
> + * Register a custom ASID allocator if we are running
> + * in a guest, the purpose is to have a system wide PASID
> + * namespace among all PASID users.
> + * There can be multiple vIOMMUs in each guest but only
> + * one allocator is active. All vIOMMU allocators will
> + * eventually be calling the same host allocator.
> + */
> + iommu->pasid_allocator.alloc = intel_ioasid_alloc;
> + iommu->pasid_allocator.free = intel_ioasid_free;
> + iommu->pasid_allocator.pdata = (void *)iommu;
> + ret = ioasid_register_allocator(&iommu->pasid_allocator);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_warn("Custom PASID allocator registeration failed\n");
> + /*
> + * Disable scalable mode on this IOMMU if there
> + * is no custom allocator. Mixing SM capable vIOMMU
> + * and non-SM vIOMMU are not supported.
> + */
> + intel_iommu_sm = 0;
> + }
> + }
> +#endif
> }
>
> bus_set_iommu(&pci_bus_type, &intel_iommu_ops);
> diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> index eea7468694a7..fb1973a761c1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
> #include <linux/dmar.h>
> +#include <linux/ioasid.h>
>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> #include <asm/iommu.h>
> @@ -542,6 +543,7 @@ struct intel_iommu {
> #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> struct page_req_dsc *prq;
> unsigned char prq_name[16]; /* Name for PRQ interrupt */
> + struct ioasid_allocator_ops pasid_allocator; /* Custom allocator for PASIDs */
> #endif
> struct q_inval *qi; /* Queued invalidation info */
> u32 *iommu_state; /* Store iommu states between suspend and resume.*/
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists