linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Configuring COCCI parameter as a directory is supportted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:55:39 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     zhongshiqi <zhong.shiqi@....com.cn>
cc:     Julia.Lawall@...6.fr, Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        nicolas.palix@...g.fr, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
        cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        xue.zhihong@....com.cn, wang.yi59@....com.cn,
        cheng.shengyu@....com.cn, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Configuring COCCI parameter as a directory is
 supportted



On Wed, 23 Oct 2019, zhongshiqi wrote:

> This patch puts a modification in scripts/coccicheck which supports users
> in configuring COCCI parameter as a directory to traverse files in
> directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhongshiqi <zhong.shiqi@....com.cn>
> ---
>  scripts/coccicheck | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/coccicheck b/scripts/coccicheck
> index e04d328..a1c4197 100755
> --- a/scripts/coccicheck
> +++ b/scripts/coccicheck
> @@ -257,6 +257,10 @@ if [ "$COCCI" = "" ] ; then
>      for f in `find $srctree/scripts/coccinelle/ -name '*.cocci' -type f | sort`; do
>  	coccinelle $f
>      done
> +elif [ -d "$COCCI" ] ; then
> +    for f in `find $COCCI/ -name '*.cocci' -type f | sort`; do
> +	coccinelle $f
> +    done
>  else
>      coccinelle $COCCI
>  fi

Thanks for the contribution.  I'm not that knowledgeable about these
scripts.  What is the relation between the last two if branches?  If the
first one fails, does that mean that $COCCI has no definition?  In that
case, is the final else useful?

thanks,
julia