linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tests: Fix a typo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:28:33 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tests: Fix a typo

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:14:17AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 04:33:24PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Correct typo in comment: s/suck/stuck.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> > index 166f411568a5..415903b48578 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void)
> >  	 * breakpointed instruction.
> >  	 *
> >  	 * Since arm64 has the same issue with arm for the single-step
> > -	 * handling, this case also gets suck on the breakpointed
> > +	 * handling, this case also gets stuck on the breakpointed
> >  	 * instruction.
> >  	 *
> >  	 * Just disable the test for these architectures until these
> 
> Thanks, and sorry for only spotting this after the offending patch was
> merged.

No worries and thanks for review.