[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191023094743.GU2819@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:47:43 +0300
From: "mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Nicholas Johnson <nicholas.johnson-opensource@...look.com.au>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"logang@...tatee.com" <logang@...tatee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: Add hp_mmio_size and hp_mmio_pref_size
parameters
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:37:48AM +0000, Nicholas Johnson wrote:
> } else if (!strncmp(str, "hpmemsize=", 10)) {
> - pci_hotplug_mem_size = memparse(str + 10, &str);
> + pci_hotplug_mmio_size =
> + memparse(str + 10, &str);
> + pci_hotplug_mmio_pref_size =
> + memparse(str + 10, &str);
Does this actually work correctly? The first memparse(str + 10, &str)
modifies str so the next call will not start from the correct position
anymore.
Otherwise the patch looks good to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists