linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: vexpress-spc: find and skip duplicates when merging frequencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191023110811.15086-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:08:11 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: vexpress-spc: find and skip duplicates when merging frequencies

Currently the cpufreq core aborts the validation and return error
immediately when it encounter duplicate frequency table entries.
This change was introduced long back since commit da0c6dc00c69
("cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently").

However, this missed the testing with modified firmware for long time.
Inorder to make it work with default settings, we need to ensure the
merged table for bL switcher contains no duplicates. Find the duplicates
and skip them when merging the frequenct tables of A15 and A7 clusters.

Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
index 093ef8d3a8d4..921dbd42b3bb 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
@@ -242,6 +242,19 @@ static inline u32 get_table_max(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table)
 	return max_freq;
 }
 
+static bool search_frequency(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table, int size,
+			     unsigned int freq)
+{
+	int count;
+
+	for (count = 0; count < size; count++) {
+		if (table[count].frequency == freq)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int merge_cluster_tables(void)
 {
 	int i, j, k = 0, count = 1;
@@ -256,13 +269,21 @@ static int merge_cluster_tables(void)
 
 	freq_table[MAX_CLUSTERS] = table;
 
-	/* Add in reverse order to get freqs in increasing order */
-	for (i = MAX_CLUSTERS - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
-		for (j = 0; freq_table[i][j].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
-		     j++, k++) {
-			table[k].frequency =
-				VIRT_FREQ(i, freq_table[i][j].frequency);
-		}
+	/* Add A7_CLUSTER first to get freqs in increasing order */
+	for (j = 0; freq_table[A7_CLUSTER][j].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
+	     j++, k++) {
+		table[k].frequency =
+			VIRT_FREQ(A7_CLUSTER, freq_table[A7_CLUSTER][j].frequency);
+	}
+	count = k;
+
+	/* And then A15_CLUSTER checking for duplicates */
+	for (j = 0; freq_table[A15_CLUSTER][j].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
+	     j++) {
+		if (search_frequency(table, count,
+				     freq_table[A15_CLUSTER][j].frequency))
+			continue; /* skip duplicates */
+		table[k++].frequency = freq_table[A15_CLUSTER][j].frequency;
 	}
 
 	table[k].driver_data = k;
-- 
2.17.1