| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:36:56 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per
block for tui
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:07:10PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> Previous patch has implemented a new sort option "total_cycles".
> But there was only stdio mode supported.
>
> This patch supports the tui mode and support '--percent-limit'.
>
> For example,
>
> perf record -b ./div
> perf report -s total_cycles --percent-limit 1
>
> # Samples: 2753248 of event 'cycles'
> Sampled Cycles% Sampled Cycles Avg Cycles% Avg Cycles [Program Block Range] Shared Object
> 26.04% 2.8M 0.40% 18 [div.c:42 -> div.c:39] div
> 15.17% 1.2M 0.16% 7 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:380] libc-2.27.so
> 5.11% 402.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:27 -> div.c:28] div
> 4.87% 381.6K 0.04% 2 [random.c:288 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so
> 4.53% 381.0K 0.04% 2 [div.c:40 -> div.c:40] div
> 3.85% 300.9K 0.02% 1 [div.c:22 -> div.c:25] div
> 3.08% 241.1K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:26 -> rand.c:27] libc-2.27.so
> 3.06% 240.0K 0.02% 1 [random.c:291 -> random.c:291] libc-2.27.so
> 2.78% 215.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:298 -> random.c:298] libc-2.27.so
> 2.52% 198.3K 0.02% 1 [random.c:293 -> random.c:293] libc-2.27.so
> 2.36% 184.8K 0.02% 1 [rand.c:28 -> rand.c:28] libc-2.27.so
> 2.33% 180.5K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so
> 2.28% 176.7K 0.02% 1 [random.c:295 -> random.c:295] libc-2.27.so
> 2.20% 168.8K 0.02% 1 [rand@...+0 -> rand@...+0] div
> 1.98% 158.2K 0.02% 1 [random_r.c:388 -> random_r.c:388] libc-2.27.so
> 1.57% 123.3K 0.02% 1 [div.c:42 -> div.c:44] div
> 1.44% 116.0K 0.42% 19 [random_r.c:357 -> random_r.c:394] libc-2.27.so
>
> v3:
> ---
> Minor change since the function name is changed:
> block_total_cycles_percent -> block_info__total_cycles_percent
>
> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 30 +++++++++++++---
> tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.h | 2 ++
> tools/perf/util/hist.h | 12 +++++++
> 4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> index dbae1812ce47..707512f177cb 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> @@ -800,6 +800,27 @@ static int hists__fprintf_all_blocks(struct hists *hists, struct report *rep)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int perf_evlist__tui_block_hists_browse(struct evlist *evlist,
> + struct report *rep)
> +{
> + struct block_hist *bh = &rep->block_hist;
> + struct evsel *pos;
> + int ret;
> +
> + evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, pos) {
> + struct hists *hists = evsel__hists(pos);
> +
> + get_block_hists(hists, bh, rep);
same here, this is display function, compute the data before
thanks,
jirka
> + symbol_conf.report_individual_block = true;
> + ret = block_hists_tui_browse(bh, pos, rep->min_percent);
> + hists__delete_entries(&bh->block_hists);
> + if (ret != 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
SNIP
Powered by blists - more mailing lists