[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0d79362ab994e269680fba75f913044@www.loen.fr>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:39:23 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář
<rkrcmar@...hat.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] arm64: Stolen time support
Hi Steven,
On 2019-10-21 16:28, Steven Price wrote:
> This series add support for paravirtualized time for arm64 guests and
> KVM hosts following the specification in Arm's document DEN 0057A:
>
> https://developer.arm.com/docs/den0057/a
>
> It implements support for stolen time, allowing the guest to
> identify time when it is forcibly not executing.
>
> Note that Live Physical Time (LPT) which was previously part of the
> above specification has now been removed.
>
> Also available as a git tree:
> git://linux-arm.org/linux-sp.git stolen_time/v7
Can you please point me to userspace patches that I could apply to
kvmtool? I'd like to give this series a go as part of my normal
testing.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists