[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sgnk5heo.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:23:27 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc: cyphar@...har.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, christian@...uner.io, keescook@...omium.org,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usercopy: Avoid soft lockups in test_check_nonzero_user()
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:00:48AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com> writes:
>> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:27:32PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> >> On a machine with a 64K PAGE_SIZE, the nested for loops in
>> >> test_check_nonzero_user() can lead to soft lockups, eg:
>> >>
>> >> watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#4 stuck for 22s! [modprobe:611]
>> >> Modules linked in: test_user_copy(+) vmx_crypto gf128mul crc32c_vpmsum virtio_balloon ip_tables x_tables autofs4
>> >> CPU: 4 PID: 611 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G L 5.4.0-rc1-gcc-8.2.0-00001-gf5a1a536fa14-dirty #1151
>> >> ...
>> >> NIP __might_sleep+0x20/0xc0
>> >> LR __might_fault+0x40/0x60
>> >> Call Trace:
>> >> check_zeroed_user+0x12c/0x200
>> >> test_user_copy_init+0x67c/0x1210 [test_user_copy]
>> >> do_one_initcall+0x60/0x340
>> >> do_init_module+0x7c/0x2f0
>> >> load_module+0x2d94/0x30e0
>> >> __do_sys_finit_module+0xc8/0x150
>> >> system_call+0x5c/0x68
>> >>
>> >> Even with a 4K PAGE_SIZE the test takes multiple seconds. Instead
>> >> tweak it to only scan a 1024 byte region, but make it cross the
>> >> page boundary.
>> >>
>> >> Fixes: f5a1a536fa14 ("lib: introduce copy_struct_from_user() helper")
>> >> Suggested-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>> >
>> > With Aleksa's Reviewed-by I've picked this up:
>> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux.git/log/?h=copy_struct_from_user
>>
>> Thanks. Are you planning to send that to Linus for v5.4 or v5.5 ?
>
> This looks like a pretty straight bugfix to me since it's clearly
> causing an issue for you on power so v5.4-rc4 is what I'd aim for. I
> just want it to be in linux-next until tomorrow.
I see it in mainine now, thanks!
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists