[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191023125853.GA7814@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:58:53 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@...mai.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, acme@...nel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf kvm: Use evlist layer api when possible
Em Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:54:53PM -0400, Igor Lubashev escreveu:
> No need for layer violations when a proper evlist api is available.
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by: Igor Lubashev <ilubashe@...mai.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c b/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
> index 5217aa3596c7..340927c2b243 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-kvm.c
> @@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ static int kvm_events_live_report(struct perf_kvm_stat *kvm)
> }
>
> if (!rc && !done)
> - err = fdarray__poll(fda, 100);
> + err = evlist__poll(kvm->evlist, 100);
> }
>
> evlist__disable(kvm->evlist);
> --
> 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists