[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h83zegp6.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:26:13 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Vishal Kulkarni <vishal@...lsio.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] string-choice: add yesno(), onoff(), enableddisabled(), plural() helpers
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> On 23/10/2019 15.13, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> The kernel has plenty of ternary operators to choose between constant
>> strings, such as condition ? "yes" : "no", as well as value == 1 ? "" :
>> "s":
>>
>>
>> v4: Massaged commit message about space savings to make it less fluffy
>> based on Rasmus' feedback.
>
> Thanks, it looks good to me. FWIW,
>
> Acked-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Thanks.
I think the question is, which tree to apply this to, who's going to
pick it up? I'm fine with any route.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists