linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/7] towards QE support on ARM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Oct 2019 02:52:15 +0000
From:   Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
CC:     Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/7] towards QE support on ARM

On 22/10/2019 18:18, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
> Sent: 2019年10月22日 18:18
> To: Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
> Cc: Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-serial@...r.kernel.org; Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>;
> linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] towards QE support on ARM
> 
> On 22/10/2019 04.24, Qiang Zhao wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2019 at 6:11 AM Leo Li wrote
> 
> >> Right.  I'm really interested in getting this applied to my tree and
> >> make it upstream.  Zhao Qiang, can you help to review Rasmus's
> >> patches and comment?
> >
> > As you know, I maintained a similar patchset removing PPC, and someone
> told me qe_ic should moved into drivers/irqchip/.
> > I also thought qe_ic is a interrupt control driver, should be moved into dir
> irqchip.
> 
> Yes, and I also plan to do that at some point. However, that's orthogonal to
> making the driver build on ARM, so I don't want to mix the two. Making it
> usable on ARM is my/our priority currently.
> 
> I'd appreciate your input on my patches.

Yes, we can put this patchset in first place, ensure it can build and work on ARM, then push another patchset to move qe_ic.

Best Regards,
Qiang