[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191023165543.GB27471@willie-the-truck>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:55:44 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, youlin.pei@...iatek.com,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>, anan.sun@...iatek.com,
cui.zhang@...iatek.com, chao.hao@...iatek.com,
edison.hsieh@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] iommu/mediatek: Use gather to achieve the tlb
range flush
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:33:08AM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> Use the iommu_gather mechanism to achieve the tlb range flush.
> Gather the iova range in the "tlb_add_page", then flush the merged iova
> range in iotlb_sync.
>
> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index c2f6c78..81ac95f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -245,11 +245,9 @@ static void mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_page_nosync(struct iommu_iotlb_gather *gather,
> void *cookie)
> {
> struct mtk_iommu_data *data = cookie;
> - unsigned long flags;
> + struct iommu_domain *domain = &data->m4u_dom->domain;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&data->tlb_lock, flags);
> - mtk_iommu_tlb_add_flush_nosync(iova, granule, granule, true, cookie);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->tlb_lock, flags);
> + iommu_iotlb_gather_add_page(domain, gather, iova, granule);
You need to be careful here, because iommu_iotlb_gather_add_page() can
call iommu_tlb_sync() in some situations and you don't hold the lock.
> static const struct iommu_flush_ops mtk_iommu_flush_ops = {
> @@ -469,9 +467,15 @@ static void mtk_iommu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct iommu_iotlb_gather *gather)
> {
> struct mtk_iommu_data *data = mtk_iommu_get_m4u_data();
> + size_t length = gather->end - gather->start;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + if (gather->start == ULONG_MAX)
> + return;
> +
> spin_lock_irqsave(&data->tlb_lock, flags);
> + mtk_iommu_tlb_add_flush_nosync(gather->start, length, gather->pgsize,
> + false, data);
> mtk_iommu_tlb_sync(data);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->tlb_lock, flags);
Modulo my comment above, this fixes my previous comment. Given that mainline
is already broken, I guess the runtime bisectability isn't a problem.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists