[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191023171514.7hkhtvfcj5vluwcg@treble>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:15:14 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, bristot@...hat.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...nel.org, namit@...are.com, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, jeyu@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/16] module: Move where we mark modules RO,X
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:16:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> @@ -157,6 +158,14 @@ static int __apply_relocate_add(Elf64_Sh
>
> val = sym->st_value + rel[i].r_addend;
>
> + /*
> + * .klp.rela.* sections should only contain module
> + * related RELAs. All core-kernel RELAs should be in
> + * normal .rela.* sections and be applied when loading
> + * the patch module itself.
> + */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(klp && core_kernel_text(val));
> +
This isn't quite true, we also use .klp.rela sections to access
unexported vmlinux symbols.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists