linux-kernel - Re: [patch V2 08/17] x86/entry: Move syscall irq tracing to C code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Oct 2019 22:54:33 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 08/17] x86/entry: Move syscall irq tracing to C code

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 09:24:13AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 2:30 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 5:31 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Interrupt state tracing can be safely done in C code. The few stack
> > > > operations in assembly do not need to be covered.
> > > >
> > > > Remove the now pointless indirection via .Lsyscall_32_done and jump to
> > > > swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode directly.
> > >
> > > This doesn't look right.
> > 
> > Well, I feel a bit silly.  I read this:

Happened to me before. Don't worry.

> > >
> > > >  #define SYSCALL_EXIT_WORK_FLAGS                                \
> > > > @@ -279,6 +282,9 @@ static void syscall_slow_exit_work(struc
> > 
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > 
> > and I applied the diff in my head to the wrong function, and I didn't
> > notice that it didn't really apply there.  Oddly, gitweb gets this
> 
> I had the same when reviewing these patches; I was almost going to ask
> tglx about it on IRC when the penny dropped.

diff is weird at times.

Thanks,

	tglx