linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 linux-kselftest-test 1/3] kunit: allow kunit tests to be loaded as a module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:33:15 -0700
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
        Matthias Maennich <maennich@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        catalin.marinas@....com, joe.lawrence@...hat.com,
        penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, schowdary@...dia.com,
        urezki@...il.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        changbin.du@...el.com,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 linux-kselftest-test 1/3] kunit: allow kunit tests to
 be loaded as a module

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 5:21 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 07:32:18PM +0100, Alan Maguire wrote:
> > kunit needs a non-exported global kernel symbol
> > (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs).
>
> Sounds like a perfect use case for the new symbol namespaces [0]. We
> wouldn't want random drivers importing this namespace, but for kunit it
> would seem reasonable.
>
> [0] https://lwn.net/Articles/798254/

Sounds good to me.