linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] cdrom: factor out common open_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:50:14 +0200
From:   Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
        Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
        Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] cdrom: factor out common open_for_* code

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 07:19:58PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >  static
> > -int open_for_data(struct cdrom_device_info *cdi)
> > +int open_for_common(struct cdrom_device_info *cdi, tracktype *tracks)
> 
> Please fix the coding style.  static never should be on a line of its
> own..

That's fine.

> 
> >  			} else {
> >  				cd_dbg(CD_OPEN, "bummer. this drive can't close the tray.\n");
> > -				ret=-ENOMEDIUM;
> > -				goto clean_up_and_return;
> > +				return -ENOMEDIUM;
> 
> Can you revert the polarity of the if opening the block before and
> return early for the -ENOMEDIUM case to save on leven of indentation?

Then I will get complaints I do unrelated changes and it's hard to
review. The code gets removed later anyway.

Thanks

Michal