lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:08:08 +0530
From:   Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fadump: Remove duplicate message.


Michal, thanks for looking into this.

On 23/10/19 11:26 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> There is duplicate message about lack of support by firmware in
> fadump_reserve_mem and setup_fadump. Due to different capitalization it
> is clear that the one in setup_fadump is shown on boot. Remove the
> duplicate that is not shown.

Actually, the message in fadump_reserve_mem() is logged. fadump_reserve_mem()
executes first and sets fw_dump.fadump_enabled to `0`, if fadump is not supported.
So, the other message in setup_fadump() doesn't get logged anymore with recent
changes. The right thing to do would be to remove similar message in setup_fadump() instead.

- Hari

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ