Date:   Thu, 24 Oct 2019 19:24:46 +0800
From:   lijiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
To:     "d.hatayama@...itsu.com" <d.hatayama@...itsu.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "bhe@...hat.com" <bhe@...hat.com>,
        "dyoung@...hat.com" <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        "jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
        "dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        "Thomas.Lendacky@....com" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
        "ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        "vgoyal@...hat.com" <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
        "kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v4] x86/kdump: always reserve the low 1MiB when the
 crashkernel option is specified

在 2019年10月24日 16:13, d.hatayama@...itsu.com 写道:
> I don't find the corresponding patch in the v5 patchset, so I comment here.
> 
Thanks for your comment.

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org
>> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of lijiang
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 2:35 PM
>> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; tglx@...utronix.de; mingo@...hat.com;
>> hpa@...or.com; x86@...nel.org; bhe@...hat.com; dyoung@...hat.com;
>> jgross@...e.com; dhowells@...hat.com; Thomas.Lendacky@....com;
>> ebiederm@...ssion.com; vgoyal@...hat.com; kexec@...ts.infradead.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v4] x86/kdump: always reserve the low 1MiB when the
>> crashkernel option is specified
>>
>> 在 2019年10月22日 16:30, Borislav Petkov 写道:
>>> This ifdeffery needs to be a function in kernel/kexec_core.c which is
>>> called by reserve_real_mode(), instead.
>>
>> Would you mind if i improve this patch as follow? Thanks.
>>
>> From 5804abec62279585f374d78ace1250505c44c6b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
>> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:27:04 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] x86/kdump: always reserve the low 1MiB when the crashkernel
>>  option is specified
>>
>> Kdump kernel will reuse the first 640k region because the real mode
>> trampoline has to work in this area. When the vmcore is dumped, the
>> old memory in this area may be accessed, therefore, kernel has to
>> copy the contents of the first 640k area to a backup region so that
>> kdump kernel can read the old memory from the backup area of the
>> first 640k area, which is done in the purgatory().
>>
>> But, the current handling of copying the first 640k area runs into
>> problems when SME is enabled, kernel does not properly copy these
>> old memory to the backup area in the purgatory(), thereby, kdump
>> kernel reads out the encrypted contents, because the kdump kernel
>> must access the first kernel's memory with the encryption bit set
>> when SME is enabled in the first kernel. Please refer to this link:
>>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204793
>>
>> Finally, it causes the following errors, and the crash tool gets
>> invalid pointers when parsing the vmcore.
>>
>> crash> kmem -s|grep -i invalid
>> kmem: dma-kmalloc-512: slab:ffffd77680001c00 invalid
>> freepointer:a6086ac099f0c5a4
>> kmem: dma-kmalloc-512: slab:ffffd77680001c00 invalid
>> freepointer:a6086ac099f0c5a4
>> crash>
>>
>> To avoid the above errors, when the crashkernel option is specified,
>> lets reserve the remaining low 1MiB memory(after reserving real mode
>> memory) so that the allocated memory does not fall into the low 1MiB
>> area, which makes us not to copy the first 640k content to a backup
>> region in purgatory(). This indicates that it does not need to be
>> included in crash dumps or used for anything except the processor
>> trampolines that must live in the low 1MiB.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> BTW:I also tried to fix the above problem in purgatory(), but there
>> are too many restricts in purgatory() context, for example: i can't
>> allocate new memory to create the identity mapping page table for
>> SME situation.
>>
>> Currently, there are two places where the first 640k area is needed,
>> the first one is in the find_trampoline_placement(), another one is
>> in the reserve_real_mode(), and their content doesn't matter.
>>
>> In addition, also need to clean all the code related to the backup
>> region later.
>>
>>  arch/x86/realmode/init.c |  2 ++
>>  include/linux/kexec.h    |  2 ++
>>  kernel/kexec_core.c      | 13 +++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/realmode/init.c b/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
>> index 7dce39c8c034..064cc79a015d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>>  #include <linux/memblock.h>
>>  #include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
>> +#include <linux/kexec.h>
>>
>>  #include <asm/set_memory.h>
>>  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>> @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ void __init reserve_real_mode(void)
>>
>>  	memblock_reserve(mem, size);
>>  	set_real_mode_mem(mem);
>> +	kexec_reserve_low_1MiB();
>>  }
>>
>>  static void __init setup_real_mode(void)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
>> index 1776eb2e43a4..30acf1d738bc 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
>> @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ extern void __crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *);
>>  extern void crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *);
>>  int kexec_should_crash(struct task_struct *);
>>  int kexec_crash_loaded(void);
>> +void kexec_reserve_low_1MiB(void);
>>  void crash_save_cpu(struct pt_regs *regs, int cpu);
>>  extern int kimage_crash_copy_vmcoreinfo(struct kimage *image);
>>
>> @@ -397,6 +398,7 @@ static inline void __crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
>>  static inline void crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
>>  static inline int kexec_should_crash(struct task_struct *p) { return 0; }
>>  static inline int kexec_crash_loaded(void) { return 0; }
>> +static inline void kexec_reserve_low_1MiB(void) { }
>>  #define kexec_in_progress false
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_core.c b/kernel/kexec_core.c
>> index 15d70a90b50d..5bd89f1fee42 100644
>> --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/compiler.h>
>>  #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
>>  #include <linux/frame.h>
>> +#include <linux/memblock.h>
>>
>>  #include <asm/page.h>
>>  #include <asm/sections.h>
>> @@ -70,6 +71,18 @@ struct resource crashk_low_res = {
>>  	.desc  = IORES_DESC_CRASH_KERNEL
>>  };
>>
>> +/*
>> + * When the crashkernel option is specified, only use the low
>> + * 1MiB for the real mode trampoline.
>> + */
>> +void kexec_reserve_low_1MiB(void)
>> +{
>> +	if (strstr(boot_command_line, "crashkernel=")) {
> 
> strstr() matches for example, ANYEXTRACHARACTERScrashkernel=ANYEXTRACHARACTERS.
> 
> Is it enough to use cmdline_find_option_bool()?
> 
The cmdline_find_option_bool() will find a boolean option, but the crashkernel option
is not a boolean option, maybe it looks odd. So, should we use the cmdline_find_option()
better?

+#include <asm/cmdline.h>

 void __init kexec_reserve_low_1MiB(void)
 {
-       if (strstr(boot_command_line, "crashkernel=")) {
+       char buffer[4];
+
+       if (cmdline_find_option(boot_command_line, "crashkernel=",
+                               buffer, sizeof(buffer))) {
                memblock_reserve(0, 1<<20);
                pr_info("Reserving the low 1MiB of memory for crashkernel\n");
        }

And here, no need to parse the arguments of crashkernel(sometimes, which has a
complicated syntax), so the size of buffer should be enough. What's your opinion?

Thanks
Lianbo
 
>> +		memblock_reserve(0, 1<<20);
>> +		pr_info("Reserving the low 1MiB of memory for
>> crashkernel\n");
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>  int kexec_should_crash(struct task_struct *p)
>>  {
>>  	/*
>> --
>> 2.17.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists