Message-ID: <CANpmjNPFkqOSEcEP475-NeeJnY5pZ44m+bEhtOs8E_xkRKr-TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:17:11 +0200
From:   Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     LKMM Maintainers -- Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
        Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] seqlock, kcsan: Add annotations for KCSAN

On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 14:28, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 04:13:01PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > Since seqlocks in the Linux kernel do not require the use of marked
> > atomic accesses in critical sections, we teach KCSAN to assume such
> > accesses are atomic. KCSAN currently also pretends that writes to
> > `sequence` are atomic, although currently plain writes are used (their
> > corresponding reads are READ_ONCE).
> >
> > Further, to avoid false positives in the absence of clear ending of a
> > seqlock reader critical section (only when using the raw interface),
> > KCSAN assumes a fixed number of accesses after start of a seqlock
> > critical section are atomic.
>
> Do we have many examples where there's not a clear end to a seqlock
> sequence? Or are there just a handful?
>
> If there aren't that many, I wonder if we can make it mandatory to have
> an explicit end, or to add some helper for those patterns so that we can
> reliably hook them.

In an ideal world, all usage of seqlocks would be via seqlock_t, which
follows a somewhat saner usage, where we already do normal begin/end
markings -- with subtle exception to readers needing to be flat atomic
regions, e.g. because usage like this:
- fs/namespace.c:__legitimize_mnt - unbalanced read_seqretry
- fs/dcache.c:d_walk - unbalanced need_seqretry

But anything directly accessing seqcount_t seems to be unpredictable.
Filtering for usage of read_seqcount_retry not following 'do { .. }
while (read_seqcount_retry(..));' (although even the ones in while
loops aren't necessarily predictable):

$ git grep 'read_seqcount_retry' | grep -Ev 'seqlock.h|Doc|\* ' | grep
-v 'while ('
=> about 1/3 of the total read_seqcount_retry usage.

Just looking at fs/namei.c, I would conclude that it'd be a pretty
daunting task to prescribe and migrate to an interface that forces
clear begin/end.

Which is why I concluded that for now, it is probably better to make
KCSAN play well with the existing code.

Thanks,
-- Marco

> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/seqlock.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> > index bcf4cf26b8c8..1e425831a7ed 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> > @@ -37,8 +37,24 @@
> >  #include <linux/preempt.h>
> >  #include <linux/lockdep.h>
> >  #include <linux/compiler.h>
> > +#include <linux/kcsan.h>
> >  #include <asm/processor.h>
> >
> > +/*
> > + * The seqlock interface does not prescribe a precise sequence of read
> > + * begin/retry/end. For readers, typically there is a call to
> > + * read_seqcount_begin() and read_seqcount_retry(), however, there are more
> > + * esoteric cases which do not follow this pattern.
> > + *
> > + * As a consequence, we take the following best-effort approach for *raw* usage
> > + * of seqlocks under KCSAN: upon beginning a seq-reader critical section,
> > + * pessimistically mark then next KCSAN_SEQLOCK_REGION_MAX memory accesses as
> > + * atomics; if there is a matching read_seqcount_retry() call, no following
> > + * memory operations are considered atomic. Non-raw usage of seqlocks is not
> > + * affected.
> > + */
> > +#define KCSAN_SEQLOCK_REGION_MAX 1000
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Version using sequence counter only.
> >   * This can be used when code has its own mutex protecting the
> > @@ -115,6 +131,7 @@ static inline unsigned __read_seqcount_begin(const seqcount_t *s)
> >               cpu_relax();
> >               goto repeat;
> >       }
> > +     kcsan_atomic_next(KCSAN_SEQLOCK_REGION_MAX);
> >       return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -131,6 +148,7 @@ static inline unsigned raw_read_seqcount(const seqcount_t *s)
> >  {
> >       unsigned ret = READ_ONCE(s->sequence);
> >       smp_rmb();
> > +     kcsan_atomic_next(KCSAN_SEQLOCK_REGION_MAX);
> >       return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -183,6 +201,7 @@ static inline unsigned raw_seqcount_begin(const seqcount_t *s)
> >  {
> >       unsigned ret = READ_ONCE(s->sequence);
> >       smp_rmb();
> > +     kcsan_atomic_next(KCSAN_SEQLOCK_REGION_MAX);
> >       return ret & ~1;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -202,7 +221,8 @@ static inline unsigned raw_seqcount_begin(const seqcount_t *s)
> >   */
> >  static inline int __read_seqcount_retry(const seqcount_t *s, unsigned start)
> >  {
> > -     return unlikely(s->sequence != start);
> > +     kcsan_atomic_next(0);
> > +     return unlikely(READ_ONCE(s->sequence) != start);
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> > @@ -225,6 +245,7 @@ static inline int read_seqcount_retry(const seqcount_t *s, unsigned start)
> >
> >  static inline void raw_write_seqcount_begin(seqcount_t *s)
> >  {
> > +     kcsan_begin_atomic(true);
> >       s->sequence++;
> >       smp_wmb();
> >  }
> > @@ -233,6 +254,7 @@ static inline void raw_write_seqcount_end(seqcount_t *s)
> >  {
> >       smp_wmb();
> >       s->sequence++;
> > +     kcsan_end_atomic(true);
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> > @@ -262,18 +284,20 @@ static inline void raw_write_seqcount_end(seqcount_t *s)
> >   *
> >   *      void write(void)
> >   *      {
> > - *              Y = true;
> > + *              WRITE_ONCE(Y, true);
> >   *
> >   *              raw_write_seqcount_barrier(seq);
> >   *
> > - *              X = false;
> > + *              WRITE_ONCE(X, false);
> >   *      }
> >   */
> >  static inline void raw_write_seqcount_barrier(seqcount_t *s)
> >  {
> > +     kcsan_begin_atomic(true);
> >       s->sequence++;
> >       smp_wmb();
> >       s->sequence++;
> > +     kcsan_end_atomic(true);
> >  }
> >
> >  static inline int raw_read_seqcount_latch(seqcount_t *s)
> > @@ -398,7 +422,9 @@ static inline void write_seqcount_end(seqcount_t *s)
> >  static inline void write_seqcount_invalidate(seqcount_t *s)
> >  {
> >       smp_wmb();
> > +     kcsan_begin_atomic(true);
> >       s->sequence+=2;
> > +     kcsan_end_atomic(true);
> >  }
> >
> >  typedef struct {
> > @@ -430,11 +456,21 @@ typedef struct {
> >   */
> >  static inline unsigned read_seqbegin(const seqlock_t *sl)
> >  {
> > -     return read_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
> > +     unsigned ret = read_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount);
> > +
> > +     kcsan_atomic_next(0);  /* non-raw usage, assume closing read_seqretry */
> > +     kcsan_begin_atomic(false);
> > +     return ret;
> >  }
> >
> >  static inline unsigned read_seqretry(const seqlock_t *sl, unsigned start)
> >  {
> > +     /*
> > +      * Assume not nested: read_seqretry may be called multiple times when
> > +      * completing read critical section.
> > +      */
> > +     kcsan_end_atomic(false);
> > +
> >       return read_seqcount_retry(&sl->seqcount, start);
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 2.23.0.866.gb869b98d4c-goog
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists