linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] i2c: at91: implement i2c bus recovery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191024150726.GA1120@kunai>
Date:   Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:07:26 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com
Cc:     kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] i2c: at91: implement i2c bus recovery


> So at the beginning of a new transfer, we should check if SDA (or SCL?) 
> is low and, if it's true, only then we should try recover the bus.

Yes, this is the proper time to do it. Remember, I2C does not define a
timeout.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)