[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQqSThGRM_wRGR2ou3B+Oqpr0nF9Fg4rhSR4Hvnxwnj3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:40:52 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: coccinelle: api/devm_platform_ioremap_resource: remove useless script
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 7:13 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2019-10-19 at 21:43 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Providing Coccinelle scripts that scream about perfectly valid code is
> > pointless, and the result is actively harmful.
>
> Doubtful.
>
> If the new code is smaller object code and correct
> than the conversion is worthwhile.
I agree.
We use multi-platform defconfig.
I always appreciate the code refactoring
that reduces the object size.
> fyi:
>
> There are already ~450 uses of this function and maybe
> ~800 possible additional conversions.
>
> > If said script was providing a correct semantic patch instead of being
> > an incentive for people to churn untested patches that span the whole
> > tree, that'd be a different story.
>
> Right.
>
>
Alexandre Belloni used
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9bbcce19c777583815c92ce3c2ff2586@www.loen.fr/
as a reference, but this is not the output from coccicheck.
The patch author just created a wrong patch by hand.
The deleted semantic patch supports MODE=patch,
which creates a correct patch, and is useful.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists