[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191024163832.31326-2-lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:38:23 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: daniel.thompson@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, broonie@...nel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
baohua@...nel.org, stephan@...hold.net,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/10] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Use PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines and tidy error message
In most contexts '-1' doesn't really mean much to the casual observer.
In almost all cases, it's better to use a human readable define. In
this case PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines have already been provided for this
purpose.
While we're here, let's be specific about the 'MFD devices' which
failed. It will help when trying to distinguish which of the 2 sets
of sub-devices we actually failed to register.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
---
drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c b/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c
index f1825c0ccbd0..cda7f5b942e7 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c
@@ -127,10 +127,11 @@ static int cs5535_mfd_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
cs5535_mfd_cells[i].id = 0;
}
- err = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, -1, cs5535_mfd_cells,
+ err = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, cs5535_mfd_cells,
ARRAY_SIZE(cs5535_mfd_cells), NULL, 0, NULL);
if (err) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "MFD add devices failed: %d\n", err);
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+ "Failed to add CS5535 sub-devices: %d\n", err);
goto err_disable;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists