lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:59:04 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> To: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_FULL On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:53:12AM -0400, Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > Start cleaning up the odd scheme of return codes, starting with FFS_FULL > +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/exfat.h > @@ -221,7 +221,6 @@ static inline u16 get_row_index(u16 i) > #define FFS_PERMISSIONERR 11 > #define FFS_NOTOPENED 12 > #define FFS_MAXOPENED 13 > -#define FFS_FULL 14 > #define FFS_EOF 15 > #define FFS_DIRBUSY 16 > #define FFS_MEMORYERR 17 Wouldn't it be better to do this as: Patch 1: Change all these defines to -Exxx and remove the stupid errno-changing blocks like this: > @@ -2360,7 +2360,7 @@ static int exfat_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode, > err = -EINVAL; > else if (err == FFS_FILEEXIST) > err = -EEXIST; > - else if (err == FFS_FULL) > + else if (err == -ENOSPC) > err = -ENOSPC; > else if (err == FFS_NAMETOOLONG) > err = -ENAMETOOLONG; then patches 2-n remove individual FFS error codes. That way nobody actually needs to review patches 2-n; all of the changes are done in patch 1.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists