[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191024121940.1d6a64df@lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:19:40 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive
'functions' to 'identifiers'
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:17 +0800
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com> wrote:
> The 'functions' directive is not only for functions, but also works for
> structs/unions. So the name is misleading. This patch renames it to
> 'identifiers', which specific the functions/types to be included in
> documentation. We keep the old name as an alias of the new one before
> all documentation are updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>
So I think this is basically OK, but I have one more request...
[...]
> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> index 1159405cb920..0689f9c37f1e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/kerneldoc.py
> @@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> optional_arguments = 4
> option_spec = {
> 'doc': directives.unchanged_required,
> - 'functions': directives.unchanged,
> 'export': directives.unchanged,
> 'internal': directives.unchanged,
> + 'identifiers': directives.unchanged,
> + 'functions': directives.unchanged, # alias of 'identifiers'
> }
> has_content = False
>
> @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
>
> filename = env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + self.arguments[0]
> export_file_patterns = []
> + identifiers = None
>
> # Tell sphinx of the dependency
> env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(filename))
> @@ -86,19 +88,22 @@ class KernelDocDirective(Directive):
> export_file_patterns = str(self.options.get('internal')).split()
> elif 'doc' in self.options:
> cmd += ['-function', str(self.options.get('doc'))]
> + elif 'identifiers' in self.options:
> + identifiers = self.options.get('identifiers').split()
> elif 'functions' in self.options:
> - functions = self.options.get('functions').split()
> - if functions:
> - for f in functions:
> - cmd += ['-function', f]
> - else:
> - cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> + identifiers = self.options.get('functions').split()
Rather than do this, can you just change the elif line to read:
elif ('identifiers' in self.options) or ('functions' in self.options):
...then leave the rest of the code intact? It keeps the logic together,
and avoids the confusing distinction between identifiers=='' and
identifiers==None .
Thanks,
jon
> for pattern in export_file_patterns:
> for f in glob.glob(env.config.kerneldoc_srctree + '/' + pattern):
> env.note_dependency(os.path.abspath(f))
> cmd += ['-export-file', f]
>
> + if identifiers:
> + for i in identifiers:
> + cmd += ['-function', i]
> + elif identifiers is not None:
> + cmd += ['-no-doc-sections']
> +
> cmd += [filename]
>
> try:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists