lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:50:14 +1300
From:   Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To:     corbet@....net, rppt@...ux.ibm.com, willy@...radead.org
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] docs/core-api: memory-allocation: fix typo

"on the safe size" should be "on the safe side".

Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
---
 Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst b/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst
index 939e3dfc86e9..dcf851b4520f 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/memory-allocation.rst
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ Selecting memory allocator
 ==========================
 
 The most straightforward way to allocate memory is to use a function
-from the :c:func:`kmalloc` family. And, to be on the safe size it's
+from the :c:func:`kmalloc` family. And, to be on the safe side it's
 best to use routines that set memory to zero, like
 :c:func:`kzalloc`. If you need to allocate memory for an array, there
 are :c:func:`kmalloc_array` and :c:func:`kcalloc` helpers.
-- 
2.23.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ