| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20191024214311.43d76a5c@jacob-builder>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 21:43:11 -0700
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/11] iommu/vt-d: Add custom allocator for IOASID
Hi Baolu,
Thanks for the review. please see my comments inline.
On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 10:30:48 +0800
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> On 10/25/19 3:54 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > When VT-d driver runs in the guest, PASID allocation must be
> > performed via virtual command interface. This patch registers a
> > custom IOASID allocator which takes precedence over the default
> > XArray based allocator. The resulting IOASID allocation will always
> > come from the host. This ensures that PASID namespace is system-
> > wide.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 1 +
> > drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 67
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/intel-iommu.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 70
> > insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> > index fd50ddffffbf..961fe5795a90 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> > @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ config INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> > bool "Support for Shared Virtual Memory with Intel IOMMU"
> > depends on INTEL_IOMMU && X86
> > select PCI_PASID
> > + select IOASID
> > select MMU_NOTIFIER
> > help
> > Shared Virtual Memory (SVM) provides a facility for
> > devices diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c index 3f974919d3bd..ced1d89ef977
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > @@ -1706,6 +1706,9 @@ static void free_dmar_iommu(struct
> > intel_iommu *iommu) if (ecap_prs(iommu->ecap))
> > intel_svm_finish_prq(iommu);
> > }
> > + if (ecap_vcs(iommu->ecap) && vccap_pasid(iommu->vccap))
> > +
> > ioasid_unregister_allocator(&iommu->pasid_allocator);
>
> Since scalable mode is disabled if pasid allocator failed to register,
> add sm_support(iommu) check here will be better.
>
I was thinking to be symmetric with register call, checking for the
same conditions. Also, I like your advice below to only disable SVA
instead of scalable mode.
> > +
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > @@ -4910,6 +4913,44 @@ static int __init
> > probe_acpi_namespace_devices(void) return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> > +static ioasid_t intel_ioasid_alloc(ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max,
> > void *data) +{
> > + struct intel_iommu *iommu = data;
> > + ioasid_t ioasid;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * VT-d virtual command interface always uses the full 20
> > bit
> > + * PASID range. Host can partition guest PASID range based
> > on
> > + * policies but it is out of guest's control.
> > + */
> > + if (min < PASID_MIN || max > intel_pasid_max_id)
> > + return INVALID_IOASID;
> > +
> > + if (vcmd_alloc_pasid(iommu, &ioasid))
> > + return INVALID_IOASID;
> > +
> > + return ioasid;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void intel_ioasid_free(ioasid_t ioasid, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct intel_iommu *iommu = data;
> > +
> > + if (!iommu)
> > + return;
> > + /*
> > + * Sanity check the ioasid owner is done at upper layer,
> > e.g. VFIO
> > + * We can only free the PASID when all the devices are
> > unbond.
> > + */
> > + if (ioasid_find(NULL, ioasid, NULL)) {
> > + pr_alert("Cannot free active IOASID %d\n", ioasid);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + vcmd_free_pasid(iommu, ioasid);
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > int __init intel_iommu_init(void)
> > {
> > int ret = -ENODEV;
> > @@ -5020,6 +5061,32 @@ int __init intel_iommu_init(void)
> > "%s", iommu->name);
> > iommu_device_set_ops(&iommu->iommu,
> > &intel_iommu_ops); iommu_device_register(&iommu->iommu);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> > + if (ecap_vcs(iommu->ecap) &&
> > vccap_pasid(iommu->vccap)) {
> > + pr_info("Register custom PASID
> > allocator\n");
> > + /*
> > + * Register a custom ASID allocator if we
> > are running
> > + * in a guest, the purpose is to have a
> > system wide PASID
> > + * namespace among all PASID users.
> > + * There can be multiple vIOMMUs in each
> > guest but only
> > + * one allocator is active. All vIOMMU
> > allocators will
> > + * eventually be calling the same host
> > allocator.
> > + */
> > + iommu->pasid_allocator.alloc =
> > intel_ioasid_alloc;
> > + iommu->pasid_allocator.free =
> > intel_ioasid_free;
> > + iommu->pasid_allocator.pdata = (void
> > *)iommu;
> > + ret =
> > ioasid_register_allocator(&iommu->pasid_allocator);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + pr_warn("Custom PASID allocator
> > registeration failed\n");
> > + /*
> > + * Disable scalable mode on this
> > IOMMU if there
> > + * is no custom allocator. Mixing
> > SM capable vIOMMU
> > + * and non-SM vIOMMU are not
> > supported.
> > + */
> > + intel_iommu_sm = 0;
>
> It's insufficient to disable scalable mode by only clearing
> intel_iommu_sm. The DMA_RTADDR_SMT bit in root entry has already been
> set. Probably, you need to
>
> for each iommu
> clear DMA_RTADDR_SMT in root entry
>
> Alternatively, since vSVA is the only customer of this custom PASID
> allocator, is it possible to only disable SVA here?
>
Yeah, I think disable SVA is better. We can still do gIOVA in SM. I
guess we need to introduce a flag for sva_enabled.
> > + }
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > }
> >
> > bus_set_iommu(&pci_bus_type, &intel_iommu_ops);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> > b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h index 1d4b8dcdc5d8..c624733cb2e6
> > 100644 --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > #include <linux/iommu.h>
> > #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
> > #include <linux/dmar.h>
> > +#include <linux/ioasid.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> > #include <asm/iommu.h>
> > @@ -546,6 +547,7 @@ struct intel_iommu {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> > struct page_req_dsc *prq;
> > unsigned char prq_name[16]; /* Name for PRQ interrupt
> > */
> > + struct ioasid_allocator_ops pasid_allocator; /* Custom
> > allocator for PASIDs */ #endif
> > struct q_inval *qi; /* Queued invalidation
> > info */ u32 *iommu_state; /* Store iommu states between suspend and
> > resume.*/
>
> Best regards,
> baolu
[Jacob Pan]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists